Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 1.1k KT voters.
44% Yes |
56% No |
43% Yes |
54% No |
0% Yes, but only if it includes subsidies for low-income citizens to afford these vehicles |
1% No, incentivize consumers and manufacturers instead of forcing them |
0% Yes, and require all emission based machinery to transition to clean energy |
0% No, the government has no right to interfere in consumer choices or the free market |
0% No, electric vehicle parts can be just as dangerous to the environment as emissions |
|
0% No, not until we find an eco-friendly and humane way to acquire the materials |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k KT voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k KT voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from KT voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MY5PP39mos9MO
The Government should improve and make public transport more accessible, financially and logistically.
@9NL4FTV9mos9MO
No, not until there is proof of safer and longer lasting power supply than lithium. The mining, manufacture and disposal of EVs is terrible for the environment.
@B3JQD7W2 days2D
No because electric cars are quiet so people could not hear the car coming which may cause more injuries, electric cars should be optional.
@B3H865Q4 days4D
Yes but provide subsidies for low-income citizens who can't afford them, but we should also invest in an eco-friendly and humane way to acquire and dispose of the materials. Also, all emission based machinery should be required to transition to clean energy by a certain date, but also provide subsidies for people who can't afford this.
@B3GCQZ25 days5D
They are withholding free energy from us. Release it to the public. Then there is no need for electric cars at all.
@B3CHPK61wk1W
Yes, but only if it subsidises payments by low-income citizens and allows all forms of green energy to be used, such as hydrogen engines and fuel cells
@B2TF9X34wks4W
to get rid of all non electric cars would be wasteful, just decrease or stop production of deisel/ petrol cars
@B2LKPGP1mo1MO
Not necessarily, non electric cars which utilize synthetic fuels, if affordable, would be just as viable.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
