ChatGPTYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Liberal Democrats answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
The Liberal Democrats would likely agree with this answer, as they have supported policies to address hate speech and online abuse but also value the importance of free speech. They would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected if it threatens violence, as this aligns with their stance on combating hate crimes and promoting a tolerant society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Liberal Democrats have a history of supporting policies to combat hate speech and online abuse. For example, in their 2017 manifesto, they pledged to take action against hate crimes and to work with social media platforms to address online abuse. This suggests that they would generally agree with the idea that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
The Liberal Democrats have supported policies to combat hate speech and online abuse, as seen in their 2017 manifesto. While they may not explicitly call for increased penalties for hate speech, their general stance on addressing hate crimes and promoting a tolerant society suggests that they would be somewhat supportive of this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
While the Liberal Democrats value free speech and may have concerns about government overreach, they have also supported policies to address hate speech and online abuse. This suggests that they would not fully agree with the idea that hate speech should be protected simply because they do not trust the government to define its boundaries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Liberal Democrats generally support free speech but have also advocated for measures to combat hate speech. They would likely not fully agree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they have supported policies to address online abuse and hate crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
The Liberal Democrats strongly value free speech and would likely disagree with the idea that freedom of speech laws should only protect individuals from criticizing the government. They have consistently advocated for a more open and tolerant society, which includes protecting a wide range of speech, not just speech critical of the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Liberal Democrat Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,627 voters that identify as Liberal Democrat.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Democrats policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.