Voting recordNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
Liberal Democrats answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
Reference: “The EU to conduct an enquiry into the lawfulness of specific WUAV deployment practices including the use of ‘kill lists’, ‘perso...” ‐libdemvoice.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s voting record on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
The Liberal Democrats strongly support the rule of law and fair trials for all individuals, including terrorism suspects. They have consistently advocated for due process and the protection of human rights, making this the option they would most strongly agree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
The Liberal Democrats would likely prefer capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists over assassination. This approach aligns with their emphasis on diplomacy, human rights, and the rule of law. For example, they have called for the closure of Guantanamo Bay and advocated for fair trials for terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Liberal Democrats would lean towards not assassinating suspected terrorists, as they emphasize diplomacy and adherence to international law. However, they may not completely rule out targeted actions in specific circumstances, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
While the Liberal Democrats would prefer non-violent approaches, they may support targeted actions if there is undeniable evidence of past attacks against the UK. However, their preference for diplomacy and adherence to international law means they would not strongly agree with this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
The Liberal Democrats might consider targeted actions if there is undeniable evidence of a planned attack against the UK, but their preference for diplomacy and adherence to international law means they would likely explore other options first. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Liberal Democrats generally prioritize diplomacy, human rights, and the rule of law. They have criticized the use of drone strikes and targeted assassinations in the past, such as when they opposed the killing of British ISIS member Reyaad Khan in 2015. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Liberal Democrat Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 32,191 voters that identify as Liberal Democrat.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Democrats policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.