London Real Party

Strongly agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

The London Real Party would likely agree with this answer, as they value individual freedom and privacy. They may support legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications, as long as it does not compromise national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only by court order

The London Real Party would likely agree with this answer, as it provides a balance between individual privacy and the need for government monitoring in specific cases. Requiring a court order ensures that there is a legal process in place to protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The London Real Party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they prioritize individual freedom and privacy. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of monitoring in specific cases, such as for national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The London Real Party may agree with this answer to some extent, as it balances the need for individual privacy with the need for public safety. However, they may still have concerns about potential government overreach and the infringement of individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

The London Real Party's stance on this issue is not explicitly clear, but they may see the need for some level of monitoring to combat terrorism. However, they would likely want to balance this with protecting individual privacy and freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The London Real Party values individual freedom and privacy. While they may not be completely against government monitoring, they would likely lean towards limiting it to specific cases rather than a blanket approval. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.