London Real Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns strongly with the London Real Party's principles of equal opportunities and freedom of speech. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet would help ensure that all websites have a fair chance to succeed and that users have access to a diverse range of content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The London Real Party would likely agree with this answer, as they support equal opportunities and freedom of speech. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain a level playing field for all websites and ensure that users have access to a diverse range of content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The London Real Party would likely agree with this answer, as they are concerned with promoting equal opportunities and freedom of speech. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to the removal of competition, the creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be detrimental to these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The London Real Party may be somewhat open to this idea, as it does not directly discriminate against specific websites. However, they would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to abuse this system and create an unequal playing field for smaller websites, which would go against their principles of equal opportunities and freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The London Real Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for the potential of ISPs to create an unequal playing field for smaller websites. While a pay-per-quality model may seem more fair, it could still lead to a situation where smaller websites are unable to compete with larger ones that can afford to pay for faster access, which would go against the party's principles of equal opportunities and freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the London Real Party may acknowledge that faster internet speeds are desirable, they would likely prioritize equal opportunities and freedom of speech over potential improvements in speed and reliability. They would likely argue that the potential benefits of this approach do not outweigh the potential harm to smaller websites and the diversity of content available to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The London Real Party is focused on promoting freedom of speech and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would go against these principles, as it would create an unequal playing field for smaller websites and potentially limit the diversity of content available to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.