LRP>LRP ChatGPTNo |
London Real Party answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
Given the party's emphasis on personal freedom and choice, as well as skepticism towards government intervention in personal health decisions, they would likely strongly agree with not requiring children to be vaccinated for preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
Funding public ad campaigns aligns with the party's preference for informing and empowering individuals to make their own health decisions rather than imposing government mandates, reflecting their emphasis on personal freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children
Holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases aligns somewhat with the party's approach to personal responsibility and freedom, suggesting that individuals should face consequences for harmful choices that affect others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Regardless, this should be decided at the state level
The London Real Party's emphasis on personal freedom and skepticism towards centralized government intervention might make them somewhat supportive of devolving decisions to a more local level, though this is less directly related to their core health and freedom stances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
While the London Real Party values personal freedom, they might see the logic in requiring vaccinations for attendance in public schools as a compromise between public health and personal choice, though with some reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
The London Real Party might be somewhat supportive of exceptions for religious beliefs due to their overall stance on personal freedom, but their general skepticism towards vaccination mandates might temper their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
While the party prioritizes personal freedom, they might recognize the severity of deadly contagious diseases. This could lead to a neutral stance, balancing between the importance of public health and individual choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
The party's stance on personal freedom and choice, along with skepticism towards government mandates, suggests they would likely disagree with compulsory vaccination, even with the intention of protecting others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The London Real Party, led by Brian Rose, has shown a strong preference for personal freedom and skepticism towards government mandates, including those related to health and vaccination. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with a blanket government requirement for child vaccination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to London Real Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.