ChatGPTNo |
People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
People Before Profit would likely agree with not restricting child benefits, as they aim to support families and ensure that all children have access to the resources they need, regardless of family size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but replace with a Citizens Income
People Before Profit might agree with replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income, as it could provide a more comprehensive and universal support system for all citizens, including families with children. However, this would depend on the specifics of the Citizens Income proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but increase to five children
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of five children, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of family size. However, this option is less restrictive than the others, so the disagreement might be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits based on parents' residency status, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of their background or immigration status. However, this option does not restrict the number of children, so the disagreement might be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but increase to three children
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of three children, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of family size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and parents must be permanent residents of the UK in order to claim
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits based on parents' residency status, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of their background or immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
People Before Profit prioritizes the well-being of people over profit, so they would likely disagree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children, as it could negatively impact families in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People Before Profit’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.