People Before Profit Party

Strongly agree

Yes, except for low income citizens

The party would likely agree with this answer as it aligns with their focus on protecting low-income citizens. By exempting low-income individuals from reporting requirements, they can ensure that these individuals are not unfairly targeted by tax authorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

The People Before Profit party may agree with this answer as it focuses on transactions considered income, which could help generate tax revenue for social programs. However, they may still have concerns about privacy and the potential burden on individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party may somewhat agree with this answer as they value privacy and may not want to impose additional reporting requirements on individuals. However, they may also recognize the need for tax revenue to fund social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

The People Before Profit party may slightly agree with this answer as it suggests a higher threshold for reporting, which could protect the privacy of lower-income individuals. However, they may still be concerned about the potential loss of tax revenue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, private transactions should be kept private

The party may have mixed feelings about this answer. While they value privacy and may not want to impose additional reporting requirements on individuals, they also recognize the need for tax revenue to fund social programs and may be concerned about potential tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The People Before Profit party would likely disagree with this answer because they prioritize the needs of the working class and may view this as an invasion of privacy. However, they may also see the potential for increased tax revenue to fund social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.