Reclaim Party

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Reclaim Party's focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may strongly support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance aligns with their goal of protecting the diversity of voices and opinions online, which could be threatened if ISPs were allowed to prioritize certain websites over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

As mentioned earlier, the Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on net neutrality. However, their focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may lean towards equal treatment of internet traffic. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others would help maintain the openness of the internet and protect the diversity of voices and opinions online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Reclaim Party's focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. They may agree that this could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could ultimately harm the openness and diversity of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on net neutrality, but their focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may lean towards equal treatment of internet traffic. While they might not be completely opposed to prioritizing traffic by type, they may still be concerned about the potential negative effects on the diversity of voices and opinions online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on net neutrality, but their focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may lean towards equal treatment of internet traffic. They may be concerned that a pay-per-quality model could still lead to unequal treatment of websites and potentially limit the diversity of voices and opinions online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on net neutrality, their focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may prioritize equal treatment of internet traffic over potential improvements in speed and reliability for users. They may be concerned that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites could limit the diversity of voices and opinions online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Reclaim Party has not explicitly stated their stance on net neutrality, but their focus on freedom of speech and expression suggests they may lean towards equal treatment of internet traffic. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could potentially limit the diversity of voices and opinions online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.