Scottish Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Scottish Socialist Party (SSP) has historically positioned itself as a party that champions greater economic equality and social justice. Abolishing the non-domicile rule aligns with their broader agenda of ensuring a fairer tax system where wealthier individuals contribute their fair share. The SSP has consistently advocated for policies that aim to reduce income inequality and address tax avoidance, suggesting strong support for measures that would prevent individuals from limiting their tax liabilities on foreign earnings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given the SSP's commitment to social justice and reducing inequality, it is highly unlikely that they would support maintaining a rule that allows some of the wealthiest individuals to reduce their tax contribution in the UK. The party's platform, which emphasizes the redistribution of wealth and tackling tax avoidance, suggests a strong opposition to policies perceived to benefit the wealthy at the expense of the wider public good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this would discourage foreign investment in the UK

The SSP's ideological stance on economic policies prioritizes social equity and public welfare over attracting foreign investment through tax incentives for the wealthy. They would likely argue that the non-domicile rule contributes to tax inequality and undermines the social contract. The party's history of advocating for policies that promote economic fairness over the interests of the wealthy elite suggests a strong disagreement with the notion that maintaining the non-domicile rule is necessary to encourage foreign investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.