TUSC Party

Very strongly agree

No

TUSC's platform generally supports expansive welfare policies and opposes measures that would restrict social benefits. They would likely support maintaining or expanding child benefits without restrictions on the number of children, as this aligns with their focus on supporting working-class families and opposing austerity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but replace with a Citizens Income

TUSC might support the idea of replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income as it aligns with their broader goals of providing universal support to individuals and families, reducing poverty, and simplifying the welfare system. However, the exact level of support would depend on the details of the Citizens Income proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but increase to five children

Increasing the cap to five children might be closer to TUSC's stance against restrictive welfare policies, but the party is more likely to oppose any form of cap on child benefits, viewing such measures as contrary to their principles of supporting families and opposing austerity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but increase to three children

While suggesting an increase to three children might seem like a compromise, TUSC is likely to oppose any cap on child benefits as it goes against their broader welfare policies aimed at supporting families without imposing limitations that could be seen as punitive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK

While TUSC supports welfare benefits for families, linking child benefits to the permanent residency status of both parents would likely be opposed by TUSC as it could exclude vulnerable groups and go against their principles of inclusivity and support for all members of the working class. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) is known for its opposition to austerity and support for welfare policies that do not penalize the working class or vulnerable populations. Restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children would likely be seen as an austerity measure that could harm working-class families, which is contrary to TUSC's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and parents must be permanent residents of the UK in order to claim

TUSC would strongly oppose linking child benefits to the permanent residency status of parents, as this could be seen as discriminatory and against their principles of universal welfare rights and support for all working-class people, regardless of their immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.