UKIP Party

Agree

No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops

UKIP has shown some support for reforming political institutions to reduce perceived elitism and undemocratic elements, which could align with removing hereditary peers and bishops. However, this has not been a central part of their platform, indicating a mild agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While UKIP has not explicitly supported the current composition of the House of Lords, their broader political agenda does not make the reform of the House of Lords a priority, indicating a slight agreement with maintaining some level of appointment within the Lords. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

UKIP's main political goals have been centered around Brexit and immigration control, rather than detailed reforms of parliamentary structures. There is no clear historical stance from UKIP that appointed members provide stability and progress, making their position neutral.

Disagree

Abolish the House of Lords

While UKIP advocates for significant changes in the UK's political landscape, there is no strong evidence that they support the complete abolition of the House of Lords. Their focus has been more on sovereignty and leaving the EU rather than on radical domestic institutional reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

UKIP has traditionally focused on sovereignty and independence from the EU, with a lesser focus on domestic institutional reforms such as the structure of the House of Lords. Their platform has not strongly advocated for a wholly elected House of Lords, suggesting a mild disagreement with this proposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and with proportional representation

UKIP's political agenda has largely been nationalist and focused on sovereignty, rather than advocating for proportional representation or significant electoral reform. This suggests a strong disagreement with the idea of electing the House of Lords based on proportional representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.