Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

UKIPs policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

UKIPs answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Given UKIP's strong stance on law and order and its emphasis on the integrity of political representatives, it is plausible that the party would support disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime from running for office, to maintain public trust in political figures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

UKIP might lean towards agreeing with this statement, reflecting a general conservative stance on law and order. The party's focus on national integrity and sovereignty could translate into a preference for candidates without criminal records, although this is not explicitly stated in their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

While UKIP might support the idea of second chances, especially for those who have served their sentences, the party's overall conservative stance on crime and punishment suggests a cautious approach. This answer reflects a possible but limited agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

This position might resonate with UKIP's law and order stance by excluding serious crimes, but the party's general approach to crime and political integrity suggests they would prefer more stringent restrictions on who can run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

This answer might be seen as a compromise position, which does not fully align with UKIP's likely preference for stronger measures against those with criminal convictions. The party's official stance on this specific scenario is not clear, leading to a neutral score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

UKIP, being a party that has often positioned itself on issues of law and order and national sovereignty, is likely to be cautious about endorsing a blanket allowance for convicted criminals to run for office. However, the lack of a specific party stance on this issue makes the score less extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

Party’s support base

UKIP Party Voters’ Answer: No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,822 voters that identify as UKIP.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to UKIPs policies? Take the political quiz to find out.