Public statementsYes |
UKIPs answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “It would be foolhardy not to maximise home produced energy and this is why UKIP will invest in shale gas exploration. If ‘fracki...” ‐cloudfront.net
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Agree
Yes
Historically, UKIP has positioned itself in favor of exploiting natural resources within the UK to achieve energy independence and economic benefits. While specific statements on hydraulic fracking may vary over time, the party's general stance on energy and resource independence suggests a likely support for fracking, albeit with some reservations about environmental and regulatory issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
This position aligns with a pragmatic approach to energy extraction, balancing economic benefits with concerns about impacts on populated areas. Given UKIP's general support for using national resources, they might agree with fracking outside heavily populated areas, reflecting a compromise between resource development and public health concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but increase oversight
While UKIP supports the exploitation of natural resources, including fracking, for national benefit, they also have a track record of criticizing excessive regulation. However, they might see the value in increased oversight to address public concerns about safety and environmental impacts, suggesting a slight agreement with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
While UKIP may support the need for research in general, their policy priorities and skepticism towards environmentalist positions suggest they would view calls for more research as potentially obstructive to energy development and economic benefits. Thus, they might mildly disagree with the stance that more research is needed before pursuing fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given UKIP's support for energy independence and utilization of domestic resources, it is unlikely that they would outright oppose hydraulic fracking. Their policies have often emphasized the importance of national resources in achieving economic and energy goals, suggesting a disagreement with a blanket opposition to fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
UKIP has traditionally been skeptical of climate change narratives and the push for renewable energy sources at the expense of traditional and nuclear energy sources. Their platform has often prioritized energy independence and economic benefits over environmental concerns, indicating strong disagreement with prioritizing sustainable energy resources over fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
UKIP Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,577 voters that identify as UKIP.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to UKIPs policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.