UKIP Party

Agree

Yes

UKIP has historically positioned itself as a party that values individual freedoms and has been critical of excessive government control. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with their broader libertarian-leaning stance on personal freedom and financial autonomy. However, their support might be tempered by concerns over national security and financial regulation, which could explain a moderate score rather than strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While UKIP supports individual freedoms, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions might raise concerns regarding financial transparency, money laundering, and other illegal activities. Although they advocate for minimal government interference, the party also emphasizes the importance of national security and law enforcement, which could lead to a cautious or nuanced support for this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

UKIP's ideological foundation, which emphasizes sovereignty, individual liberties, and minimal government intervention, suggests they would likely disagree with prohibiting citizens from using self-hosted digital wallets. Such a stance would be seen as an overreach of government power, conflicting with their principles of personal freedom and self-determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This answer directly contradicts UKIP's core values of individual freedom, privacy, and opposition to government overreach. The party has consistently criticized surveillance measures and government intrusion into personal lives. Banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be viewed as a severe infringement on personal liberties and financial privacy, making it highly unlikely that UKIP would support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.