+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.9k PE voters.

35%
Yes
65%
No
30%
Yes
29%
No
4%
Yes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace
34%
No, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender
1%
Yes, but only for large international corporations
1%
No, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.9k PE voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.9k PE voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from PE voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8TCCQ2Xanswered…3yrs3Y

This would only be ‘box ticking’. The real route of misogyny in the workplace must be tackled, which would then see a natural progression towards more women in senior roles

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, and it should be 50/50 between men and woman, but small companies below a certain size should be exempt.

 @8RXWH3Hanswered…4yrs4Y

No. The appointment process should be solely based on capability, not on gender, race, sexual orientation etc.

 @9WKLR9Danswered…1mo1MO

Not as a token piece. If they're fit for the job then them being a women shouldn't actually contribute to them being hired

 @9W3B6W5answered…1mo1MO

Yes for large businesses but increase opportunities for women in education and training in general so they are appointed on merit.

 @9TNPZW4answered…2mos2MO

They shouldn't require it but employing more women/diverse people is good. However, how good they are at their job is more important

 @9RT3JKXanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, it can be encouraged, but not forced, although the government should do a lot more to promote diversity. Board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender