+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 9k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

59%
Yes
41%
No
29%
Yes
39%
No
18%
Yes, but only by court order
2%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
7%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
5%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 9k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 9k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9PXL2XK answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only with undeniable evidence that it would prevent harm to others, and if nothing is found within a given time period all recordings and information gathered should be destroyed and all monitoring discontinued immediately

 @8KJS969answered…4yrs4Y

 @9PPQ4YRanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only for the purposes of preventing terrorism or other acts for the preservation of public safety

 @9PP3CQ9answered…5mos5MO

This is a very complex issue. In most cases, no, but there will be exceptional circumstances and there needs to be a discussion on how a truly independent process to set this would work.

 @9NZ8JK2answered…5mos5MO

Yes but only for legitimate serious criminal investigations where a proper warrant has been obtained

 @9NL327Ganswered…6mos6MO

Yes for those with criminal background plus on the general public to flag up key words which may bring to light new criminal activity

 @9NJBXRPanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, if a person is identified as posing a risk to national security and for preventing and detecting Terrorism

 @9M3FPKRanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only by court order and and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications