+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.8k ME voters.

15%
Yes
85%
No
12%
Yes
70%
No
1%
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
11%
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
1%
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
4%
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
1%
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.8k ME voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.8k ME voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from ME voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9LQH3MDanswered…7mos7MO

No, treat all the same and I don't believe Internet providers should be able to meddle with speed, particularly to end users via phone line companies. This should be illegal and business should set the example

 @9JZM429 answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but this should be available as a separate contract that you buy, and be cheaper than just regular internet, and also should be made very clear that this is the case.

 @9G5MCLJanswered…1yr1Y

Treat all traffic equally as otherwise competition will be removed and artificial scarcity would be created, leading to a price hike.

 @9BZW66Wanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as there's a maximum to the level of disparity they are allowed to create