@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomyStarted 10yrs agoActive 3 days ago

Should the government use economic stimulus to aid the country during times of recession?

An economic stimulus is a monetary or fiscal policy enacted by governments with the intent of stabilizing their economies during a fiscal crisis. The policies include an increase in government spending on infrastructure, tax cuts and lowering interest rates. After the Brexit vote in 2016 the Bank of England proposed a stimulus package designed to boost the economy and prevent a recession. The package included purchasing corporate debt and low rate commercial bank loans.

87%
Yes
13%
No
70%
Yes
9%
No
4%
Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens
2%
No, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess
4%
Yes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery
2%
No, and the government should drastically reduce spending during recessions
3%
Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for all citizens
3%
Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure
3%
Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
1%
Yes, and collectivize all industry

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Economic Stimulus” has changed over time for 52.4k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Economic Stimulus” has changed over time for 52.4k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…3 days3D

No, the government should interfere with the economy as little as possible, especially as recession is a natural cycle that purges excess. The government should aim for a net zero fiscal balance - no surplus, no deficit

 @9BDPLSPanswered…1yr1Y

My knowledge on economics is limited at best

 @946BL2Kanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but in the form of a Universal Basic Income, awarded to all residents

 @8CX7CGWanswered…4yrs4Y

Don’t know enough.

 @9D7GRBKanswered…10mos10MO

Yes, consistent with the Modern Monetary Theory framework

 @9CJHNNWanswered…11mos11MO

Yes, by direct cash transfers to poorer citizens

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Economic Stimulus” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

China Creates A Global Economic Shock

The first China shock came after a series of liberalizing reforms in China in the 1990s and its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. For U.S. consumers, this brought considerable benefits. One 2019 paper found that consumer prices in the U.S. for goods fell 2% for every extra percentage point of market share grabbed by Chinese imports, with the biggest benefits felt by people on low and middle incomes. But the China shock also piled pressure on domestic manufacturers. In 2016, Autor and other economists estimated that the U.S. lost more than two million jobs between 1999 and 2011 as a result of Chinese imports, as makers of furniture, toys and clothes buckled under the competition and workers in hollowed-out communities struggled to find new roles. A sequel of sorts appears to be under way. China’s economy expanded 5.2% last year, a subdued rate by its standards, and is expected to slow further as a drawn-out real-estate crunch crushes investment and consumers rein in spending. Capital Economics, a consulting firm, thinks annual growth will slow to around 2% by 2030. Beijing is seeking to engineer an economic turnaround by plowing money into factories, especially for semiconductors, aerospace, cars and renewable-energy equipment, and selling the resulting surplus abroad. Protectionism might shift some of the deflationary impact to other parts of the world, as Chinese exporters look for new markets in poorer countries. Those economies could see their own fledgling industries shrivel in the teeth of Chinese competition, much as the U.S. did in an earlier era.

  @lemans3427 from California submitted…3mos3MO

Commercial Real Estate Crisis Threatens Global Economy

Recent global events have sparked fears of a commercial real estate crisis in Europe, mirroring situations in Japan and the US. Notably, Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG faces significant downturns due to the real estate market's weakness.The past week has witnessed significant downturns in the stock values of several banks worldwide, particularly those with substantial exposure to commercial property loans. Mirroring unsettling developments in Japan and the United States, Europe is now facing the prospect of an emerging commercial real estate crisis. Some senior officials at the European Central Bank say Germany will inevitably be a special focus as they examine CRE risks at banks across the region.“There is more pain to come in real estate valuations, so what does that mean for lenders and does that mean there is the potential for a crisis?”German banks have the most commercial real estate loans in the European Union, along with their French peers, but they have classified a relatively small portion of those loans as non-performing. Recently, however, that share has been rising while it declined in several other countries.“This is definitely not just a US problem,” said Valeriya Dinger, a professor of economics at Germany’s University of Osnabrueck. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a wave of loan loss provisions for German banks on their domestic commercial real estate exposure,” she said, even if there’s no systemic risk.German property values are particularly vulnerable to higher borrowing costs because capitalization rates — or the potential return on a real estate investment — were pushed lower there than in other markets during the cheap money era. That reflected in part the fact that yields on German government bonds, a benchmark for investors, were negative at the time.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.