+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 496 Chatham voters.

36%
Yes
64%
No
21%
Yes
64%
No
9%
Yes, but only for those seeking part time instead of permanent employment
5%
Yes, but ban exclusivity clauses and guarantee a minimum number of hours

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 496 Chatham voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 496 Chatham voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Chatham voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9LKZ2H8answered…11mos11MO

Yes, but only in industries such as the arts and entertainment where self-employed creators require flexible part time work.

 @9PJ624Yanswered…9mos9MO

0 hour contracts are good but employers should respect when they give them a particular set of hours for months/ years they shouldn’t suddenly drop the hours to nothing.

 @B26S3B7answered…3mos3MO

Yes, with a higher minimum wage, no exclusivity clauses and other regulations to prevent employers who want the best of both worlds for themselves.

 @9P4YPH7answered…9mos9MO

There should be a limit on the number of people on 0 hours so a company cannot have all staff on the contract, just a few in a ‘bank’ contract to fill vacancies in essential services

 @9Q46V97answered…9mos9MO

Not mandatory, only zero hours contract for those who want it. Employee should not have to be on call

 @9P6V5MRanswered…9mos9MO

People should consider things such as mental health, disabilities and neurodiversities+ the type of work that people do when making people sign a contract.

 @9Q58J4Zanswered…9mos9MO

I’m most cases no as they don’t often have enough regulation but they can be helpful for some people - often younger people and students who just need some cash

 @9Q3YZ69answered…9mos9MO

Individuals should be given guaranteed hours unless they have specified that they want to be on a zero hours contract