+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 8.4k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

52%
Fewer
43%
More
32%
Fewer
24%
More
14%
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
11%
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
6%
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
6%
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
2%
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
1%
More, current benefits should be capped

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 8.4k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 8.4k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8SK6DMWanswered…4yrs4Y

It should be stricter on the basis of excluding those with self inflicted matters that mean that they cannot work. Such as those who are obese, take drugs or alcoholic. Why should the state support those who don’t help themselves.

 @9Y99VYBanswered…3wks3W

There should be fewer as if you fix the benefit system loopholes then it will cost the Government less and less people would be on benefits.

 @8W5KHR2  from Maine  answered…3wks3W

fewer, but benefits need to be greatly improved with more psychological implementation to help people who struggle on benefits.

 @9WW67X7answered…4wks4W

More restrictions. Benefits go to those that need it most. Benefits should consider personal wealth and assets and income.

 @9W9QX3Vanswered…1mo1MO

Fewer for sick and disabled recipients and those looking for work. But regardless a U.B.I. ought to be introduced and an initiative for voluntary work.