Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 127 Sarah Hall voters.
6% Yes |
94% No |
3% Yes |
91% No |
3% Yes, replace it with a bill of rights that gives the UK more legislative control |
3% No, but criminals should lose many of these rights |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 127 Sarah Hall voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 127 Sarah Hall voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Sarah Hall voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9FRFHMS1yr1Y
Yes, but replace it with a reformed version codified and agree by referendum and parliament vote and blocked from being removed or amended by parliament without another referendum
@4VNQ2BS4yrs4Y
No, but criminals should lose rights depending on the severity of their crime/crimes.
@9N33YJV6mos6MO
Only for people who committed crimes against children, rape or sexual assault or any other crime that can fall under this category
@8GHCTYY4yrs4Y
The question is far too broad to answer accurately.
@8JYNF9P4yrs4Y
People who have committed crimes inflicted on children and vulnerable people, such as sex crimes, homicide, etc, should loose these rights.
@9X8XZMQ3wks3W
Yes and they should make a new one based on each individual, depending wether they are a good person or bad. they should get mord punishments for breaking this act.
@9QFZV8D5mos5MO
A distinction should be made for criminals who use the humans rights act as a way of staying in the country for example the grooming gangs leaders in Rochdale who made themselves stateless and still in the communities being paid for by tax payers.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
