+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 156k Liberal Democrats voters.

60%
Yes
35%
No
49%
Yes
17%
No
12%
Yes, and with proportional representation
13%
No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops
5%
No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 156k Liberal Democrats voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 156k Liberal Democrats voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Liberal Democrats voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JBZT7N answered…11mos11MO

No, but I think it should be reformed, not have inheritable titles, and be made up in experts of all fields to assess efficacy of laws passed in the commons.

 @9D89GCPanswered…1yr1Y

The Lords should be chosen by the government based on their fields of expertise and skills, but remove hereditary peers and bishops.

 @9QJWJ69answered…5mos5MO

Yes, anyone over the age of 18 should be able to apply for the 2nd level 'jury service'-style 'law review committee service'.

 @9QFDGZTanswered…5mos5MO

No, but only hereditary members should be kept. All non-nobility in the house of Lords should be removed permanently

 @9QCVFRDanswered…5mos5MO

No, but the positions should be more diverse (eg all regions represented) or appointed specialisms (law, business, or environment) and time limits on how long they can serve.

 @9Q9LLXGanswered…5mos5MO

Hereditary peers should be abolished. Religious peers should be limited to one per main religion. Some peers to be elected by PR but on a fixed term. Other peers to be independently appointed based on prior work for society, expertise etc.