+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 431k UK voters.

61%
Yes
34%
No
53%
Yes
20%
No
8%
Yes, and with proportional representation
9%
No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops
5%
No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 431k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 431k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JBZT7N answered…1yr1Y

No, but I think it should be reformed, not have inheritable titles, and be made up in experts of all fields to assess efficacy of laws passed in the commons.

 @9Z9KQ6K  from Maine  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, the house of lords should be a body based on academic knowledge to act as a balance to the house of commons

 @9Z9KQ6K  from Maine  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, the house of lords should be a body based academic knowledge to act as a balance to the house of commons

 @9D89GCPanswered…1yr1Y

The Lords should be chosen by the government based on their fields of expertise and skills, but remove hereditary peers and bishops.

 @9QJWJ69answered…7mos7MO

Yes, anyone over the age of 18 should be able to apply for the 2nd level 'jury service'-style 'law review committee service'.

 @9QFDGZTanswered…7mos7MO

No, but only hereditary members should be kept. All non-nobility in the house of Lords should be removed permanently