+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 51.4k Green voters.

68%
Yes
22%
No
56%
Yes
12%
No
12%
Yes, and with proportional representation
8%
No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops
3%
No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 51.4k Green voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 51.4k Green voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Green voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JBZT7N answered…11mos11MO

No, but I think it should be reformed, not have inheritable titles, and be made up in experts of all fields to assess efficacy of laws passed in the commons.

 @9D89GCPanswered…1yr1Y

The Lords should be chosen by the government based on their fields of expertise and skills, but remove hereditary peers and bishops.

 @9QJWJ69answered…5mos5MO

Yes, anyone over the age of 18 should be able to apply for the 2nd level 'jury service'-style 'law review committee service'.

 @9QFDGZTanswered…5mos5MO

No, but only hereditary members should be kept. All non-nobility in the house of Lords should be removed permanently

 @9QCVFRDanswered…5mos5MO

No, but the positions should be more diverse (eg all regions represented) or appointed specialisms (law, business, or environment) and time limits on how long they can serve.

 @9Q9LLXGanswered…5mos5MO

Hereditary peers should be abolished. Religious peers should be limited to one per main religion. Some peers to be elected by PR but on a fixed term. Other peers to be independently appointed based on prior work for society, expertise etc.