Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Trend of support over time for each answer from 12.1k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 12.1k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9QXRSPS2yrs2Y
@9PB4QF52yrs2Y
@BDXGSVQ2wks2W
@BDFJQPM1mo1MO
@BDDHFN71mo1MO
@BD2SHQM 2mos2MO
@BD2BLYR2mos2MO
@BBHVBS24mos4MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 12.1k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.
