Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
95% Yes |
5% No |
95% Yes |
5% No |
See how support for each position on “Transportation Accessibility for People with Disabilities” has changed over time for 2.8k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Transportation Accessibility for People with Disabilities” has changed over time for 2.8k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NGH7YF5 days5D
No - as much as possible but need to be pragmatic that some rural services wouldnt be viable if this was the case
@9MRYBPQ 2wks2W
No, the cost of adapting every bus and train to suit a tiny minority seems to outweigh the benefits when a subsidising an on-demand, Uber-like service could be done instead
@DAVIE 2wks2W
Yes, but only where it is practically possible and isn't economically damaging.
@9MWXF78 2wks2W
That depends on the definition of disability. That can mean anything and everything.
@9MV4FB52wks2W
Only where it is not cost prohibitive to the taxpayer or organisations that may pass those costs on to them
@9MV3J722wks2W
Yes, for new systems, and as far as practicable for existing systems
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.
