+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 137 Cities of London and Westminster voters.

93%
Yes
7%
No
93%
Yes
7%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 137 Cities of London and Westminster voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 137 Cities of London and Westminster voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Cities of London and Westminster voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9MRYBPQ answered…6mos6MO

No, the cost of adapting every bus and train to suit a tiny minority seems to outweigh the benefits when a subsidising an on-demand, Uber-like service could be done instead

 @9T8LC3Yanswered…3mos3MO

I'm leaning towards irrelevant questioning but I believe public transportation is inclusive enough to people with disabilities

 @9RMYM3Xanswered…4mos4MO

No because private companies will do it anyway as there is a profit incentive and it will speed up the boarding process for disabled travellers

 @9QNVR83answered…5mos5MO

Yes but only where the building/terrain allows it. Listed buildings etc should be exempt from ugly additions and find other methods of being disabled - friendly such as ramps and more facilities on the ground floor

 @9QFZGVManswered…5mos5MO

In an ideal world yes, however many UK transport systems are dated and the money is better spent on new infrastructure

 @9QCRB8Yanswered…5mos5MO

yes, within reason though. some councils have spent money for only a couple of users. Must undertake studies to determing use

 @9Q7XG4Hanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, of course. It's a no-brainer! Access to public transport for people with disabilities in this country is dire and they don't all have access to their own transport (eg: Motability adapted vehicles).

 @9PYM929answered…5mos5MO

Only where it is possible to improve existing infrastructure. All new infrastructure should be implemented with this in mind.