Answer Overview

Response rates from 27.4k UK voters.

50%
Yes
50%
No
50%
Yes
50%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 27.4k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 27.4k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9PFG4M8answered…4mos4MO

Palestine shouldn't be grouped with countries such as North Korea when it comes to sanctions especially due to the ongoing crisis.

 @9NBN8YP from New York  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, exceptions should be made if the money goes to humanitarian aid. In this case, the burden of proof should be on the recipient

 @8SZTB3Z answered…3mos3MO

Palestine, absolutely not (why should people be allowed to send money to Israel which is currently run by war criminals?). Cuba? Outdated nonsense. Venezuela? Why, because they have a left-wing government? Russia, North Korea, Iran - OK.

 @9QWT5T4answered…4mos4MO

Yes to prevent terrorism only. As long as it can be shown it's not for terror no further action should be t-ken

 @9QSCSHJanswered…4mos4MO

Sanctions should be lifted on Palestine but keep sanctions for the remainder of these countries, and sanctions should be closer targeted at leaders and the state apparatus and anything that funds tools of repression

 @9PDVLF9answered…4mos4MO

money sent to families is fine it is when it is used to fund criminal / terrorist organisations that it should be banned

 @9Q48XWNanswered…4mos4MO

All payments to such a country must be on a record available to police indefinitely. This should not generally result in police concern, but may do

 @9MTLQHBanswered…5mos5MO

Draft strict legislation to ensure transactions of this type are used for the benefit of people and citizens rather than financing corrupt regimes or autocracies.