Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 27.3k UK voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 27.3k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 27.3k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDHYJMSanswered…1mo1MO

Maybe because they could be talking about something that the country has no idea about and important conversations could be held which the public would probably want to know about. It’s our future too.

 @BDGMX9Danswered…1mo1MO

No, as there may be privacy issues and it could be a social meeting. However tough penalties should be imposed where evidence may be demonstrated that preferential treatment or other business related communication has been engaged in without suitable reference.

 @BDGC4SCanswered…1mo1MO

yes, as public should have full transparency on all government agendas but no as private dialogue may be necessary for effectiveness

About This Data

Based on 27.3k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should there be a total ban on private sector representatives meeting with ministers without public logs?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://uk.isidewith.com/poll/5540608741

Embed The Live Result

Preview