Water services in England and Wales are provided by privately owned regional companies. In recent years, concerns have grown over sewage discharges, infrastructure underinvestment and shareholder dividends. Nationalisation would mean returning these companies to public ownership and state control. Proponents argue that public ownership would prioritise environmental standards and reinvest profits into infrastructure. Opponents argue that nationalisation would be costly for taxpayers and that stronger regulation is a better solution.
Response rates from 977 UK voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 977 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 977 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BF32HSB6 days6D
@BDLH9GY1mo1MO
@BDCP32Z2mos2MO
@BD8D4D22mos2MO
@BCYVCXJ2mos2MO
@BCYR22K2mos2MO
@BCLJHZZ3mos3MO
@BobbyWalker 3mos3MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 977 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.