This movement, often called 'Smartphone Free Childhood', argues that the rise in youth anxiety and cyberbullying correlates directly with the release of the first smartphone. Proponents believe government intervention is necessary because individual parents cannot fight the addictive algorithms of trillion-dollar tech companies alone. Opponents argue that a ban is unenforceable, disconnects children from their peers, and that digital literacy is a crucial skill that should be taught rather than prohibited.
Response rates from 1k UK voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BDVBLG63wks3W
@BDJL3HW1mo1MO
@9WTN5BT 1mo1MO
@9WTN5BT 1mo1MO
@9WTN5BT 1mo1MO
@BDH52PV 1mo1MO
@BDG43F91mo1MO
@BCSG7Q42mos2MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 1k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.