Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsUK Politicsthe EnvironmentClimate ChangeEnergy PolicyNet ZeroSustainability•••Started 4mos agoActive 2wks ago

Should the government delay its target to reach Net Zero carbon emissions by 2050?

The UK legally committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 100% relative to 1990 levels by 2050. Proponents argue that delaying action will lead to catastrophic environmental damage and higher long-term costs. Opponents argue that rapid decarbonization mandates place an unfair financial burden on citizens during a cost-of-living crisis and damage industrial competitiveness.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.2k UK voters.

38%
Yes
62%
No
27%
Yes
52%
No
6%
Yes, the deadline drives up energy costs and unfairly burdens working families.
6%
No, the target drives green investment and creates the high-skilled jobs of the future.
5%
Yes, rely on innovation and the free market rather than arbitrary government deadlines.
5%
No, climate change is an existential threat that demands immediate action regardless of cost.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.2k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.2k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDXYLZ3answered…2wks2W

Climate change is mostly natural so cutting to solar power won’t stop it, this is a waste of funding

 @BDFWYB4answered…1mo1MO

Only for areas of society that pollute the most, e.g. landfill sites, large factories, but not private vehicles, trains or aircraft, especially cars.

 @BDDKTSLanswered…1mo1MO

Probably a mix of both. Major reduction in carbon emissions should be the aim but more of a rely of innovation should be the goal rather than showmanship policies which don’t work and raise costs

 @BD9WZJ2answered…2mos2MO

it's fake bollocks

 @4SNPK4B answered…3mos3MO

No, the climate crisis is a catastrophic threat that demands immediate action. We should be aiming to bypass the Net Zero milestone as quickly as possible.

 @BBQGW3Yanswered…4mos4MO

No, if the opportunity is used to create manufacturing and agricultural jobs for the working classes.

 @BBKVH8Canswered…4mos4MO

Yes, but divert cuts in climate spending towards international climate aid

 @BBFC7Q3answered…4mos4MO

The technology isn't there, instead we are forcing people to get things like electric cars knowing that in the long run they will have cost us more.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

Active 2mos ago

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…6yrs6Y

Should critical race theory be taught in K-12 education?

No

▲  19.8k6 replies4 agree1 disagree

About This Data

Based on 1.2k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should the government delay its target to reach Net Zero carbon emissions by 2050?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://uk.isidewith.com/poll/5545231474

Embed The Live Result

Preview