The debate over slavery reparations questions whether modern governments should provide financial compensation for the trans-Atlantic slave trade and its lasting economic impacts. Proponents, including groups like CARICOM, argue that Western industrial wealth was built on stolen labor, creating a generational wealth gap that requires restorative justice and debt cancellation to fix. Opponents argue that liability for historical wrongs does not transfer to current taxpayers who never owned slaves, and that resources are better spent on forward-looking economic policies rather than litigating the distant past.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Region
Response rates from 1.9k UK voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BDZW44B5 days5D
@BDK4M44 1mo1MO
@BDF5GBG1mo1MO
@BBWCYL73mos3MO
@BBHJB5R 4mos4MO
No, we should support reparations but not financially. Our national wealth was built on stolen labour, it would cripple the economy. Instead, potentially having some kind of a voluntary model or using national service as a way of fostering connections through volunteering in countries where slavery took place to help the countries grow would be more positive.
@BBGBH3R4mos4MO
@BBF9ZZQ4mos4MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 1.9k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.