Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), such as fizzy drinks, nuggets, and packaged snacks, have been linked to rising obesity rates and chronic illnesses. Proponents of the tax argue it is a necessary intervention to reduce consumption of unhealthy additives and save the NHS billions in preventable treatment costs. Opponents argue it is a regressive 'Nanny State' tax that unfairly punishes low-income families who rely on cheap, long-lasting processed foods during a cost-of-living crisis.
Response rates from 1.6k UK voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.6k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.6k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BDRPFGS 4wks4W
@BDKJ6QB1mo1MO
@BDFCV4S1mo1MO
@BD8D4D22mos2MO
@BD5Y3PQ2mos2MO
@BD2BPWH2mos2MO
@BCWVB592mos2MO
@BCMLM6K3mos3MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 1.6k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.