The 'culture war' debate over Britain's memorial landscape exploded into the mainstream in 2020 when protestors in Bristol toppled the statue of 17th-century slave trader Edward Colston and threw it into the harbor. This catalyzed a nationwide audit of street names, university buildings, and public monuments linked to the British Empire, forcing institutions to reckon with how history is curated in public spaces. Proponents of removal argue that statues are symbols of veneration, not history books, and that taking them down reflects a mature society correcting past injustices. Opponents argue that removing statues 'cancels' history, warning that sanitizing the past prevents future generations from learning from it and often targets figures who also made significant philanthropic or historical contributions.
Response rates from 808 UK voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 808 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 808 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 808 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.