+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2k SN1 2 voters.

22%
Yes
78%
No
20%
Yes
59%
No
2%
Yes, but gradually phased out over time
9%
No, but they should be self funded and pay taxes
4%
No, they are a positive influence on tourism, charity, and international relations
3%
No, but reduce their funding
2%
No, but only provide financial support for immediate heirs to the throne

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2k SN1 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2k SN1 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from SN1 2 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @57Z4LX5from Oldham  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4YHC3Q2from Derbyshire  answered…4yrs4Y

No, they should be given more power. The government is corrupt and full of liars. The Monarch needs to be able to tear the government apart and rebuild it in order to fulfill Democracy to its full potential.

 @4TTW7YZfrom Croydon  answered…4yrs4Y

If they cost more than they make in revenue, then yes the monarchy should go, especially seeing as there are some people in this country living in poverty. That money would be better spent on the poor to make this an equal system. You cannot call our system a democracy with a non elected head of state, it's not fair.

 @9MMCL33answered…6mos6MO

No and the Monarch should be more involved in holding politicians to account, overrule unjust legislation and disolving parliment for election when the govenment does noit have public support

 @9MCPFV6answered…6mos6MO

What use are the royal family? They are a pointless anachronism, embarrassing and cringeworthy, and should've been gone years ago.