Should AI companies be required to pay royalties to creators whose work was used to train their models?
This issue is central to current class-action lawsuits where artists allege AI models were illegally built on their intellectual property. Proponents argue tech companies are strip-mining human creativity to automate artists out of a job without consent. Opponents contend that AI 'learns' patterns rather than copying files, and restrictive laws would stifle innovation and hand a monopoly to the few giants wealthy enough to pay licensing fees.
Toggle voterbase
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Region
City
Answer Overview
Response rates from 1.3k UK voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.3k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.3k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 1.3k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.




