Should Scotland’s unique “not proven” verdict be abolished in criminal trials?
Scotland's legal system is unique in offering three verdicts: Guilty, Not Guilty, and Not Proven. Often called the "bastard verdict," "Not Proven" has the same legal effect as "Not Guilty" (acquittal) but implies the jury believes the accused is guilty but lacks evidence. Proponents of abolition argue it protects rapists and denies victims closure; opponents argue it prevents wrongful convictions in a system that allows majority verdicts (8 out of 15) rather than unanimity.
Answer Overview
Response rates from 57 UK voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 57 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 57 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 57 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.




