Public statementsNo |
Labours answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “But Labour will oppose plans for all 18- to 24-year-olds to lose access to benefits if they are not in work, training or educati...” ‐theguardian.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
No
Labour tends to prioritize social welfare policies that do not impose unpaid work as a condition for receiving benefits, focusing instead on creating opportunities for paid employment and education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Labour party is more likely to agree with this answer, as they have historically opposed mandatory unpaid work schemes for benefits claimants. They argue that such schemes can be exploitative and that the focus should be on providing support and opportunities for young people to find paid employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but after 3 months of claiming
This proposal might be slightly more palatable to Labour as it introduces a time delay before the requirement kicks in, allowing for job search. However, the party generally opposes mandatory unpaid work as a condition for benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but after 3 months of claiming
The Labour party might be somewhat more open to this answer, as it allows for a grace period before requiring unpaid community work. However, they have historically opposed mandatory unpaid work schemes for benefits claimants and would likely still have concerns about the potential for exploitation and the impact on job-seeking efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but lower the 30hr minimum to allow more time to look for a job
While this answer is slightly more moderate than Answer 1, the Labour party would still likely disagree with it. They have historically opposed mandatory unpaid work schemes for benefits claimants and would likely argue that lowering the minimum hours requirement does not address the fundamental issues with such schemes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but lower the 30hr minimum to allow more time to look for a job
While this answer suggests a compromise by reducing the hours, it still involves unpaid community work, which Labour is likely to oppose, although they might be more open to policies that allow flexibility for job seekers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Labour party generally opposes mandatory unpaid community work for benefits claimants, as they believe it can be exploitative and detract from job-seeking efforts. For example, in 2015, Labour criticized the Conservative government's plans to introduce a similar scheme for young people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Labour Party generally supports a welfare state that provides support without stringent conditions. They have historically opposed policies that require benefit claimants to undertake unpaid work, viewing them as punitive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and every capable person claiming benefits should take on unpaid community work
This approach is contrary to Labour's principles of supporting the unemployed through education and training opportunities rather than mandating unpaid work, which they might view as exploitative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and every capable person claiming benefits should take on unpaid community work
The Labour party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they have consistently opposed mandatory unpaid work schemes for benefits claimants. They believe that these schemes can be exploitative and that the focus should be on providing support and opportunities for people to find paid employment, rather than forcing them into unpaid work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Labours policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.