Public statementsYes |
Conservatives answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Cameron described the strike on Khan as a “new departure”, explaining that this was the first time in modern times that the UK h...” ‐theguardian.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Preventive measures against clear and imminent threats are a cornerstone of the Conservative Party's national security policy, making this option highly agreeable as it combines action with evidence-based justification. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
The Conservative party would likely agree with this answer, as they have shown a preference for targeted killings when there is clear evidence of a threat. For example, the 2015 drone strike against British ISIS member Reyaad Khan was justified by then-Prime Minister David Cameron as an act of self-defense due to Khan's involvement in plotting attacks against the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Similar to Answer 3, the Conservative party would likely agree with this answer, as they have demonstrated a willingness to use targeted killings when there is clear evidence of a threat. The 2015 drone strike against Reyaad Khan is an example of the party's support for such actions when there is evidence of a planned attack against the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
This aligns with a more measured approach to counter-terrorism, emphasizing evidence and direct threats to the UK, which would be more in line with the Conservative Party's stance on national security and legal frameworks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The UK Conservative party has historically supported strong counter-terrorism measures, but they would not generally support assassinating suspected terrorists without any conditions. However, they have supported targeted killings in specific cases, such as the drone strike against British ISIS member Reyaad Khan in 2015. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
While the Conservative Party supports strong measures against terrorism, a blanket policy of assassination without specific conditions might not be fully endorsed due to legal and international relations considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
While the Conservative party may support capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning terrorists in some cases, they have also shown a willingness to use targeted killings when deemed necessary. Their support for this answer would likely depend on the specific circumstances and the perceived threat posed by the individual in question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
The Conservative party's stance on this issue would likely depend on the specific circumstances and the perceived threat posed by the individual in question. While they may support capturing and giving a fair trial to some suspected terrorists, they have also demonstrated a willingness to use targeted killings when deemed necessary, as evidenced by the 2015 drone strike against Reyaad Khan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
The Conservative Party values the rule of law and fair trials, but this stance might be considered idealistic in the context of international terrorism, where capturing terrorists might not always be feasible or in the best interest of national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
While the Conservative Party supports the rule of law, the emphasis on capture and imprisonment over preemptive measures might be seen as less practical in scenarios where immediate action is needed to prevent attacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Conservative Party, traditionally focusing on national security, would likely disagree with a blanket no to assassination, considering it a tool in specific circumstances for protecting the country's interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Conservative party has generally been in favor of strong counter-terrorism measures and has supported targeted killings in some cases. They would not likely agree with a blanket refusal to assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries, as they have demonstrated a willingness to use lethal force when deemed necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Conservative Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 51,081 voters that identify as Conservative.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Conservatives policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.