People Before Profit Party

Very strongly agree

No

The People Before Profit Party would strongly agree with maintaining traffic laws rather than relying on voluntary compliance. This stance aligns with the party's broader commitment to public safety, regulation for the common good, and the belief in the role of government in protecting its citizens. Traffic laws are a fundamental aspect of public safety, reducing accidents and fatalities on the roads. The party's approach to governance, emphasizing the protection and well-being of the public, naturally supports the enforcement of laws designed to ensure safe and orderly transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The People Before Profit Party, with its focus on public welfare and safety, would likely strongly disagree with the idea of eliminating all traffic laws in favor of voluntary compliance. This party's policies generally emphasize the importance of regulations to protect the public and ensure fairness, which would extend to the realm of road safety and the necessity of traffic laws to prevent accidents and ensure the orderly flow of traffic. Eliminating these laws would contradict the party's principles of safeguarding public welfare and promoting responsible governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.