Public statementsYes, strictly screen immigrants for criminal backgrounds |
UKIPs answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, strictly screen immigrants for criminal backgrounds
Reference: “This means approximately halving gross immigration for a five-year period. This will still allow us to bring in the key skills w...” ‐cloudfront.net
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, we currently have too many immigrants
This statement directly reflects UKIP's longstanding position that the UK has too many immigrants and that stricter controls are necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, strictly screen immigrants for criminal backgrounds
Screening immigrants for criminal backgrounds is a policy that would resonate well with UKIP's emphasis on security and controlled immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and regularly review recent immigrants to ensure they have become productive citizens
This aligns closely with UKIP's views on immigration, emphasizing not only stricter controls but also the integration and productivity of immigrants in the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
UKIP has consistently advocated for stricter immigration controls as a core part of its platform, arguing that current levels are unsustainable and a stricter policy is needed to control the flow of people into the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but make the process easier for skilled workers
While UKIP advocates for stricter overall immigration controls, they have shown some support for skilled workers who can contribute to the economy, making this a moderately agreeable stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, the current policy is sufficient
Given UKIP's strong stance on the need to reform and tighten immigration rules, it's unlikely they would find the current policy sufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and make the process easier for refugees
UKIP's platform focuses on reducing immigration, including asylum seekers and refugees, making it unlikely they would support making the process easier for refugees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
UKIP's foundational policies revolve around reducing immigration, making it highly unlikely they would agree with a stance advocating against stricter immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, accept anyone who's not a violent criminal
UKIP's immigration stance is much more restrictive than simply excluding violent criminals, making this position contrary to their policy objectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
UKIP Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,752 voters that identify as UKIP.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to UKIPs policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.