Women's Equality Party

Very strongly agree

No

The Women's Equality Party would strongly agree with this answer as they advocate for social justice and equality. They would likely argue that reducing benefits for tenants with more bedrooms than occupants would disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals and families. While they have not specifically addressed this issue, their general stance on social justice and equality suggests they would support maintaining benefits for these tenants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exception for those with disabled family members

The Women's Equality Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it includes an exception for those with disabled family members, which aligns with their focus on social justice and equality. However, they might still be concerned about the potential negative impact on other vulnerable individuals and families who do not have disabled family members but may still face challenges in finding suitable smaller properties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they refuse to move to an available smaller property

The Women's Equality Party might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it still implies a reduction in benefits for tenants with more bedrooms than occupants. While this answer includes a condition that tenants must refuse to move to an available smaller property, the party's focus on social justice and equality suggests they would still be concerned about the potential negative impact on vulnerable individuals and families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Women's Equality Party would strongly disagree with this answer as they focus on social justice and equality. Reducing benefits for tenants with more bedrooms than occupants would disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals and families. The party has not specifically addressed this issue, but their general stance on social justice and equality suggests they would oppose such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.