24%
Yes
76%
No
13%
Yes
67%
No
5%
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
8%
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
3%
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
3%
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
0%
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Mandatory Military Service” has changed over time for 1.4m UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Mandatory Military Service” has changed over time for 1.4m UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @58M8D8Vfrom Southampton answered…4yrs4Y

 @9CPQT8Yanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but include other emergency and public services for those not wishing the military.

 @9L2X73Lanswered…4mos4MO

18-25 would be more appropriate, only for repeat offenders and it should be a shorter period of time e.g. six-eight weeks

 @9R4RSQTanswered…1wk1W

No, serving should be an option, but there should be some focus on education and skill development, not just the training, however for three years if they choose to serve, and they should serve in the medical core and then when they are 21 then they can choose whether they want to go into full-time military service

 @9QLJVR3answered…3wks3W

If they havent got a career or education plan in place, National service (not necessarily military) should be served before anyone is eligible for any benefits.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.