49%
Yes
51%
No
42%
Yes
41%
No
4%
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
7%
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
3%
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
2%
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
0%
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Term Limits” has changed over time for 87.6k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Term Limits” has changed over time for 87.6k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9MFSRN4answered…5 days5D

Yes! Add a minimum term of a year, so folks in power for 2 weeks don't end up with a fat old pension

 @9M4MY76answered…2wks2W

No, but salaries should be reflective if the salaries of the rest of the country and they should be required to have worked in industry, nursing, teaching, etc….

 @9LXL7HYanswered…3wks3W

No, it would hamper the legislative process with constant by-elections, with general elections and the 'Recall of MPs Act 2015' holding MPs to account.

 @9L4VP4Xanswered…2mos2MO

Yes. Term limits should be promoted until corporate and organizational lobbying/funding is abolished, along with other forms of corruption which does not lead to true and healthy democratic representation.

 @9KZM56Sanswered…2mos2MO

No, but an MP should not be allowed to run for the same constituency after winning two elections and losing a 3rd. Give new aspiring politicians a chance. The defeated MP can run elsewhere however.

 @9HD7XT3 answered…6mos6MO

Difficult - some people are exceptional and we want their public service for as long as possible - age however find the mind and there should be cognitive testing post 65

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.