In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
City
Parish
Response rates from 378 SL voters.
54% Yes |
46% No |
54% Yes |
46% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 378 SL voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 378 SL voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from SL voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PKWB269mos9MO
No, but there should be a notice telling the viewer that the post is political advertising. And social media should show advertising equally from all parties.
@9KSJ3LZ12mos12MO
No but tighter regulations should be implemented to ensure truth and fairness are adhered to and misinformation is removed, acknowledged as such and any further advertising by offending party/individual be prohibited
@9SXMWBD6mos6MO
No, but it should be clear that it is advertising and people's information should not be sold to target potential voters.
@9QK948W8mos8MO
Yes if political parties pay for ads. BUT influencers should have their free speech and talk about their political opinions if they wish so.
@9QHMH9D8mos8MO
There should be no political advertising and a more informative civilised approach should be taken to the election as the attempt to discredit other parties is similar watching adults behave in a way that teacher are attempting to correct in children
@9QFYQ728mos8MO
no, but the advertising should be spread evenly so the public sees all parties and candidates no matter their views, rather than based on 3rd party biased advertising data
@9QFXHQJ8mos8MO
No, but these should be clearly marked as advertisements and not presented as editorial or user-generated content.
@9QBJKNB8mos8MO
No but it should be regulated. Limits must be set to prevent larger parties dominating the conversation and the narrative
Join in on the most popular conversations.
