@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcareStarted 4yrs agoActive 2mos ago

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…  

Read more
77%
Yes
23%
No
64%
Yes
18%
No
9%
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
3%
No, fund national and local programs instead
3%
Yes, but decrease the amount
1%
No, it has shown to be ineffective
1%
Yes, and increase the amount

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 21k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 21k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @974V27Wanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and I’m satisfied with the amount that is funded

 @96RDHRSanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but investigate WHO corruption

 @93W65BJanswered…2yrs2Y

The Government should instead fund a Health and Social Care organisation that is created as a Commonwealth of Nations group, weaving together 56 countries and pooling their knowledge to better co-ordinate their individual efforts regarding Healthcare reinforcing their duty to the people.

 @93RLLFFanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but it has shown to be ineffective

 @9KH5D8Kanswered…2mos2MO

Establish a UK World Health Organisation programme that provides helps and medical care for nations in need.

  @Kovu answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but it should be capped and used/funded appropriately and with strict regulations and safeguarding in place, also there should be a balance and a lot of funding should also go into national and local services and programs too.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “World Health Organization” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4wks4W

WHO Official Says Vaccine Passports Were A Scam

The World Health Organization’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised her government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite explaining that the COVID vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security. The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.Dr. Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization. Testifying yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmissionDuring that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to "create an international trusted framework" for safe travel while EU members states began rolling out COVID passports. The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.But Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her institute advised the Finnish government in late 2021 that COVID passports no longer made sense, yet certificates continued to be required. Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff reported the news yesterday after leaving the Helsinki courtroom where Dr. Nohynek spoke.

2 replies

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.