Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.8k Environmentalism voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.8k Environmentalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.8k Environmentalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Environmentalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9868V6Manswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but for child sex offences and animal abuse and cruelty and sex offences against animals.

 @982MF94answered…4yrs4Y

Only if it’s a horrific crime with undeniable evidence AND permission from the criminal for the death penalty as it’s their body

 @9M4KN5R answered…2yrs2Y

There has to be undeniable proof, too many mistakes have happened previously. Either that or prisons need sorting as not enough space for criminals as is.

 @9L757Y5answered…2yrs2Y

No, I feel that inflicting death on any human is hypocritical as a punishment, saying that nobody can kill as it is a cardinal sin, but then going and killing the person who killed. In my eyes that would mean anybody involved in the decision of the death sentence would also then be described as murderers.

 @96HZKQ2answered…4yrs4Y

 @9LZBQMQanswered…2yrs2Y

Convicts with a life sentence should serve five years before termination, and if they are found to have been wrongly convicted then the prosecution that resulted in the death would suffer the same punishment.

 @9M65LBKanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for the worst and repeat offenders. It is wrong that taxpayers' money is used to keep evil people alive when the money could be spent on the deserving.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.