+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.6k B15 voters.

35%
Yes
65%
No
20%
Yes
60%
No
14%
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
3%
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
1%
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
2%
No, too many people are innocently convicted

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.6k B15 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.6k B15 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from B15 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9868V6Manswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but for child sex offences and animal abuse and cruelty and sex offences against animals.

 @982MF94answered…2yrs2Y

Only if it’s a horrific crime with undeniable evidence AND permission from the criminal for the death penalty as it’s their body

 @9M4KN5R answered…7mos7MO

There has to be undeniable proof, too many mistakes have happened previously. Either that or prisons need sorting as not enough space for criminals as is.

 @9L757Y5answered…8mos8MO

No, I feel that inflicting death on any human is hypocritical as a punishment, saying that nobody can kill as it is a cardinal sin, but then going and killing the person who killed. In my eyes that would mean anybody involved in the decision of the death sentence would also then be described as murderers.

 @9M24XHFanswered…7mos7MO

No but laws should be stricter and horrific crimes with undeniable evidence criminals should not be given options of parole, reduced sentences or good behavior benefits

 @9LZBQMQanswered…7mos7MO

Convicts with a life sentence should serve five years before termination, and if they are found to have been wrongly convicted then the prosecution that resulted in the death would suffer the same punishment.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.